I am not going to address any more posts in this thread, whether they are for me or against me. But I would like to address one particular post before I bow out.
Old Fart: I want you to understand this clearly, if you can see it for what it is and not have blinders on when reading it.......
I have NOTHING against mixed children. Nothing against children, period. I love kids. Which is precisely why I have been laboring to make my point(s) to the hordes of people who just don't seem to get it. So, for the LAST time (in this thread anyway) let me be CRYSTAL clear:
If a mixed child is born, or if ANY child is born for that matter, to loving, attentive, responsible, adept parents and a likewise supportive extended family, then I am very much thankful for that and welcome such a scenario.
However.....(and the point I have tried to make and reitterate countless times), if they are an afterthought and a secondary consideration to the outcome of a couple's sexual fantasy or kink (not considered until the would-be parents have gotten their rocks off for the sole purpose of sexual gratification) then that is an irresponsible, negligent and almost criminal, act.
Women are not cattle and to even associate them, and the would-be-born children, to the term breeding, is ugly in and of itself. People of such character (or the lack thereof) should not be reproducing mixed or same race children period. There are enough single-parent families already in our society where children grow up fatherless. The struggles of a single parent unit are well-known. We needn't add to the monumental task of child-rearing by making the most essential, privileged and important task of human kind any harder than it already is.
Now again, if it is a conscious choice between consenting adults who have been responsible enough to plan ahead for the duties and responsibilities of parenting and their primary interests and utmost concerns are the child's welfare then, by all means, may they produce little bundles of joy and love them unconditionally, living happily-ever-after. To do otherwise is a disservice to themselves, the children and all of society.
This is to say nothing of the "sperm donor" who is perfectly agreeable to do nothing other than rut, plant seed and disappear. Oh how thrilled will the son or daughter of that man be when they find out how they were conceived! Still further, what of the black man with a conscience who wishes to be a part of the child's life but is unable to do so for ramifications within the couples social standing of friends and family? How would this hurt or affect him? So many would-be problematic scenarios could arise from such an irresponsible act if not painstakingly diligently thought-out and considered beforehand! Is this what we want for our children? Children of any ethnicity? More heartache and hardship?
Shame, shame, shame!!!
And don't even get me started on those who wish to, whether in fantasy or not, provide their own daughters to black men (or any man) for the purpose of sexual whim. That is nothing short of sick and to ask me (or anyone with a conscience) to be tolerant of such is an incredible affront and insult into morality. As I said yesterday; intolerance should not be mistaken for bigotry nor should tolerance be misconstrued as free license to behave in any deplorable manner one wishes. Again; freedom is not the ability to do what one wishes but rather the responsibility to do what one ought.
Indeed, for the triumph of evil, all that is necessary is for good men to say and/or do nothing. I don't think Edmund Burke coined this phrase to entitle tolerance for such things as allowing a woman to be "bred," with the children a secondary consideration, or to allow parents to provide their daughters as sperm receptacles for the sexual pleasures of black or any other race of man!
But, to those who think intolerance of such things makes me a monster, then I will say to you all: I pity you and will pray that your sickness is somehow lifted. And that God and your children will somehow, someway be able to forgive you for what you've done, what you've thought and for what you are.