Mac,
I'll begin with your "big wrap-up assertion:"
MacNfries said:
Sorry if that ruins your cuckold therapy case, but sometimes you got to recognize and respect a serious situation and know when to stay the fuck out of it.
Ms. Lexxi asked me, in a PM, for my comments. I commented. If you don't like that — fuck you, asshole. I owe nothing to you or your half-baked opinions.
Regarding the rest of your post: it's hard to see the relationship (if there is any) between what you've said and my post that you're apparently referring to. Regarding:
MacNfries said:
Custer Laststand, I'm not the least surprised in your response, afterall, you've always had a bit of a problem differentiating between what is REAL and what is NOT REAL.
Bullshit. This is nothing more than an admission that your views of human nature differ from mine, combined with an unsupported assumption that therefore, you're right and I'm wrong. To put it as pleasantly as possible: I find your comments unconvincing, and I don't agree with you.
MacNfries said:
To you, cuckolding is cuckolding ... and that's simply not so.
I've never said that. The spectrum of interactions among husbands, wives and lovers described in the threads and posts of this forum is highly variable and, in my opinion, very interesting. That's the reason I participate.
MacNfries said:
We have a real woman with a real husband, having a sexual fling with a black man...
Finally, you got something right. From time-to-time in Ms. Lexxi's thread, doubters (always men) appeared who asserted her thread is a work of fiction by a man who was posting a fantasy; they challenged her to "prove" that she's really a woman and her posts are "real." In an anonymous forum of this nature, disbelief is not an entirely unreasonable point of view, since fictional threads have, in fact, been started and carried forward from time-to-time by aspiring fiction writers. If the "original poster" doesn't confess in response to being called out by someone, or doesn't make it obvious the thread is fiction with (e.g.) some sort of massive inconsistency, one has only one's judgement to use in discriminating which threads are real from those that might not be. My feeling is, Ms. Lexxi's thread is "real."
MacNfries said:
...who says he wants no commitment ... and your best advice is ... fuck him more, a lot more.
If you think I said that, you're wrong. You badly misread my previous post. I said that would be the most likely outcome if Ms. Lexxi were to take YOUR advice and leave her husband and move into an apartment of her own, where (according to your fantasy) she would be able to abstain from sex with her lover AND her husband and contemplate her naval. Please... give me a break. What planet are you from, anyway...?
MacNfries said:
You seem to constantly be in a long winded state of fantasy play.
Again, let me be specific. Fuck you, asshole.
MacNfries said:
Lexxi is a typical scenerio of a woman getting involved with a man where the romance/emotional foundation is missing. Most women desire/need to have romance along with their sex.
That's variable. Some women do, others don't. I've had sexual relationships with both kinds.
MacNfries said:
I've cautioned about this many times when men have come to these forums wanting to know how to get their wives to go out on their own and get sexually involved with other men.
So what? The mere fact you pontificate about this and that in this anonymous forum "cautioning" people with your pet ideas does not imply forum members pay any attention to your ax grinding. People live their own lives.
MacNfries said:
Women don't approach sexual relationships like men. Men are much more capable of separating sex and love ... we mostly respond with our dicks, and if romance only comes along once in a million years, its ok as long as we are getting our dicks wet.
Again with the bullshit, pretending you "know" how women approach sex. Maybe you should read the two books by Ms. Michelle Langley I suggested to Ms. Lexxie (see above). She makes the interesting point that for men, love is commitment. For women, love is a feeling. Has that insight ever occurred to you during your exhaustive pontifications on "how women think and feel"? I doubt it. It wouldn't hurt you, every "once in a million years" (as you put it), to raise your sights above the level of the crap you watch on television and do some actual thinking.
MacNfries said:
Back to Lexxi's situation ... you say she should "obtain an honest explanation from her lover of why he terminated his previous relationship with a white married woman."
That wouldn't be a bad idea. An even better idea would be for Ms. Lexxi to find out who she is and spend some time talking with her.
MacNfries said:
This black guy has already stated his intentions...
Suppose we just call him a "guy" (or Ms. Lexxi's lover). And yes, that's true... but, as I noted, her description of that was rather brief. Maybe he said everything there was to say about why he ended his previous relationship in a few words. On the other hand, maybe he didn't.
MacNfries said:
...and he doesn't owe her any further explanations.
What does your opinion have to do with it? That would be for Ms. Lexxi to determine. If he states that (in essence), it would not be a point in his favor and she could take it into account in deciding how to view the nature of their relationship and the problem of how to proceed.
MacNfries said:
He'll continue to fuck her until she realizes he's not going to provide the emotional side to the relationship, and she'll eventually break it off herself once she realizes he's fucking 2-3 other white women as well. With any luck, she'll be able to get through this without getting herself pregnant ... a strategy some women try to use to obligate/get commitment from their men.
Please, spare me your rank speculation based on personal prejudices, all disguised as "truth," and your pretend "insight" into Ms. Lexxi's motivations.
MacNfries said:
.... [Ms. Lexxi's] biggest concern isn't whether to continue her infidelity with her lover, it's how to deal with her cuckolded husband.
Wrong. She needs to deal with both simultaneously. Anyone with any experience in management, however modest, would consider that obvious.
MacNfries said:
She doesn't need influence from us on a decision ONLY SHE can internally come to terms with.
If forum members said that to everyone who posted here, this wouldn't be a very interesting forum, would it...?
MacNfries said:
Leaving the only man she's ever been romantically involved with, to this point, is a major step for her, as she sees it as her own fault for it happening.
Arguably, divorcing her husband may be a good thing for Ms. Lexxi to do at this point. As you may recall (or maybe you don't) from the early posts in her thread, she said she and her husband were both virgins when they married. That means neither of them had the range of sexual experiences necessary to make a judgement as to whether they would be capable of long-term marriage to each other, nor did they have knowledge of whether they were sexually compatible. As it turned out, they weren't. As it also turned out, that's very important to Ms. Lexxi. Thus, a good thing for her to do at this point may be to acknowledge she made a mistake, file for divorce and move on. Since the two of them don't have children (evidently), minimal damage would be caused by her doing that now. By this I don't mean she SHOULD do that, but certainly it's an option and obviously she's thinking about it.
MacNfries said:
As I said, when I realized she was only looking for support, not advice, that's when I quit posting to her thread.
If you think I care why you do or do not post in any given thread, you're wrong. I don't.
—Custer