Layer.Five said:Just wow.
You really want your wife to be happy. I admire that and you value her dignity and her desires which is very gentlemanly. I could learn a thing or two from you. I love how she's faithful to her word. She sounds like a real lady.
radicalguy said:Well, yes of course I want Brenda to be happy, but it isn't totally as selfless as all that. Truth is, I get an incredible vicarious thrill knowing that my wife is being "taken" by another man, especially a virile "hunk" of a man like Ramiro. He has taken her from me, albeit temporarily, and she feels like she "belongs" to him sexually to the extent that she needs to be faithful to him.
Unlike some guys on this board, I don't get off on any kind of overt humilliation, nor would I be happy if I thought I would never have my wife again. Invariably, Brenda always eventually tires of her outside relationships, and then our sex life resumes with renewed vigor.
Rick
Layer.Five said:So is the monogamous idea sort of her idea or yours? Is she spiritual/relgious to some degree?
radicalguy said:Well, I go into that somewhat in my first post. It has nothing to do with religion.
Brenda has difficulty being sexual with more than one man at a time. The way she explains it, she is "wired" to belong to one man sexually. She needs to immerse herself in him.
Initially, we did the swinging thing, and it left her cold. She is not able to compartmentalize sex from love. She must belong to a guy exclusively in order to really feel sexually satisfied. In her words, right now she is Ramiro's "mate," in a sexual sense, even though she is still 100% committed to me as my wife. As for being in a sexual relationship, for her it is all or none. She can't divide her sexual drive between men.
Raks said:You say she is unable to compartmentalize sex from love and yet you say she is 100 % committed to you as your wife. Sort of contradictory isn't it. Because to have sex with Ramiro, she would have to love Ramiro and would have to committ to him. I know a person can love more than one, the capacity to love is unlimited, but the capacity to commiit is not. So I guess, she might be committed to your marriage bonds, but I think its wrong to say that she is committed to the marriage. If she is committed to you as a wife, she has to be you mate,because she can't compartmentalize love and sex. This is something I concluded from your statement. Of course I can only guess what happens between you two, you only know better and sorry if I am wrong, but your words made me say so.
radicalguy said:I never said I totally understood it. I guess, in a way, there is some separation between love and sex. Brenda clearly loves Ramiro, and is "mated" to him, but she still considers me her "soul mate." Also, her relationship with Ramiro is in the nature of a hot and heavy affair, which Brenda has always treated as temporary.
In any event, despite her need to be sexually exclusive to Ramiro right now, Brenda has proven her loyalty and commitment to me. She always tells me that if I ever want her to end things with Ramiro, she will honor my wish.
As of now, however, I am happy to allow Brenda to enjoy her affair with Ramiro.
Raks said:SO would I be right in concluding that She loves Ramiro and loves to have sex with him, while she only want you to be her companion or more as a non-sexual friend. And will she end her relationship with Ramiro if you say so "Without asking any questions and without any pain"? I know I am asking some questions and I hope that you take them as the questions of a curious person, but doesn't she removes your hand whenever you try to be sexual with her? Why does that happen? If she is as loyal and as committed to you as you say, then why doesn't she treats your advances with love and compassion and why as if she is cheating on her Lover?
radicalguy said:I don't hound her for sex and have her push me away--except maybe in a subtle way, on occasion, when hand has sort of wandered to her privates, she would sort of move in a way to avert contact, without actually making a "denial" thing over it. The hold we put on marital sexual contact is my gift to her, not something she "takes away" from me.
radicalguy said:The hold we put on marital sexual contact is my gift to her, not something she "takes away" from me.
Raks said:I have read your whole narration. And thank you for responding in the way you are. Someone else in your place might have told me to fuck off. What I was trying to say is that if she really loves you, do you need to explicitly say that her affair has run its course and now it must end. Why can't she sense that your sexual desire, or your hands on her body as a sign that you really need her and put an end to her affair, or say take a pause in her affair to cool you down first. What she does actually surprises me, because you say its your gift to her.
If it is a gift, obviously the person who has given the gift cannot ask the gift back, but what I feel is yes, she should release you from your self imprisonment whenever you desire her, particularly if none of you knows when the affair may end and it might be your turn.
Regards
Raks said:Dear RadicalGuy
More than five months have gone by. Are you still waiting for Brenda to end her affair? Are they still going great guns ?
suki_sissy said:I'd be fascinated to hear more as well. I'm a member of two sites - this and a British one - and though this thread may not have the quickie 'punch-in-the-pants' erotic appeal of the more obvious and pictorially-illustrated variants of the cuckold lifestyle, in every other way it is just a mile above any other I've read on either site.
I echo others about RadicalGuy's writing style. You're much much better than you give yourself credit for. One reason for that is the emotional honesty with which you describe what has happened. I recognise Brenda, and the nature of your relationship, because it so closely mirrors my own marriage. This is real - recognisable - life, not talk of 'bulls' and 'sluts' and 'breeding' and what-have-you. This is people recognising that sex is meant to have an emotional depth and in the end cannot avoid becoming 'stale and unprofitable' when it does not.
What RadicalGuy actually describes covers a vast number of people round the planet - far beyond the world of cuckoldry as a choice - except that for most of the rest it goes 'Marry, cheat, divorce, pay a bunch of money to lawyers, marry again, keep fingers crossed... ad infinitum'.
Cuckoldry is a far from simple choice - but then lifelong monogamous marriage is an imperfect thing, a compromise. Though there are exceptions, by and large men and women are wired differently sexually. RadicalGuy and Brenda have found their way to keep the emotional bond - that crucial thing 'companionship' - intact. I suspect many long-stayer marriages bumble along with cuckoldry (or its male equivalent) as the unspoken 'elephant in the room'. 'Don't ask; don't tell'.
They've been more honest. And all the things he says about what Brenda can - and cannot - do, and what she can - and cannot - stand him doing on his part, ring 100% true of the relationship I had with my wife.
I should say, that marriage did end after 13 years - but for many reasons, of which active cuckoldry was only one small component. But the idea that she could have had sex with any of the men she was involved with - and 'involved' is exactly the right word - with me present in the room would have been unthinkable to her. As would most of the 'customs' so beloved of the 'bulls and hotwives' scene. She would have run a mile, seeing it as utterly alien to her nature.
I don't 'diss' those - male or female - who make a mutal and totally open game of their sexual pleasures... but I suspect they are a very small minority of the people who live in marital or marriage-like relationships. I simply don't think most women can handle that kind of lifestyle emotionally. Sex is just too personal for them to treat it in that fashion. Most are much more like Brenda.
Thank you for the thread, RadicalGuy. It digs deep into the truth of a real relationship, not just some casual wank-fodder. I salute you for the discipline you've brought to your side of the relationship. So many on here seem to think you can make a set of chess rules to govern 'successful cuckoldry'. 'Only if I'm told every graphic detail', 'Only if I'm present', 'Only if I get creampies', 'Only if I control you!'...
Life ain't like that for most people. And IMHO - if people's emotional life is not to 'wither on the vine' - nor should it be!
radicalguy said:So far, Brenda's relationship with Ramiro is turning out to be the most moving and exhilarating of all the outside sexual relationships she has had. I hope that, when it ultimately ends, it will not end on a negative note. I really like Ramiro on many levels, and would hate to see the guy hurt.