And the plans of women....
Son of John,
Son of John said:
Thanks.
Son of John said:
As for guys who claim the have fucked large numbers of women, they could be lying.
Definitely. I suppose it could be called the "high school (/college) locker-room phenomenon."
Son of John said:
It is far less likely that a woman would lie about the numbers of men who have fucked her. It is very unfair, but society tends to label a man with lots of experience a "Stud", but a woman with similar experience is called a "Slut". Totally unfair, but that's life.
I agree, since patriarchal — particularly religious — social organizations generally attempt to label a woman with high sexuality (as you point out) in terms that clearly imply she should be considered an outcast. But, of course, roughly 50% of all women — perhaps somewhat less, depending on how broadly one defines "median" — have sexuality somewhere in the "above median" range, by definition.... and there's no reason to believe the percentage of women having "high to very high" sexuality* is less than the percentage of men in that catagory. A significant number, however, may try to suppress it due to the social and religious penalties applied to women who are openly sexual.
Note that, a short time ago in historical terms, the origin of homo sapiens (that's us, of course) was traced to a woman in Africa dubbed "Eve" who, it was shown, had borne about 25 children. She has never been dismissed as "that slut Eve" (or something equivalent), suggesting that anthropologists are less judgmental than religious and other social conservatives.... and more inclined to be awed by that level of reproductive performance.
Son of John said:
The other side is that it is far easier for a woman to find someone to fuck with when she is ready, than for a man. Few women, if they are attractive at all, will be turned down if they offer to fuck with guys.
I agree.... although this could lead to an unfortunate debate about what constitutes being "attractive at all."
Son of John said:
And I do agree that having a wife who is so much more experienced is a plus. Being a Cuckold, this plays right into the kind of stimulus I need in order to fuck her myself.
This seems consistent with the feelings and experiences expressed by many cuckolds on this forum. Your wife being "much more experienced" than you suggests she is highly sexual and provides you with continuing evidence of that. In turn (according to your posts), this feeds back into your feelings of intense attraction for her. In essence, your wife's high sexuality, combined with other men recognizing and acting on that (presumably encouraged by your wife, although perhaps indirectly), forms a positive-feedback loop with your own sexuality.
Son of John said:
Also, as we all know, there is a special feeling of conquest on the part of all those would-be fuckers out there if they can fuck a married woman.
There is, I think, strong support for this as an evolutionary imperative. That is, if a man other than a woman's husband (or long-term mate) fucks her and she bears one or more of his children, he is — from his point of view — getting something for nothing. He propagates his genes while his children are raised by the married woman and her husband (/mate). It turns out, however, he isn't getting something for nothing.... because from the point of view of the married woman, he is a backup husband who (because of his interest in his own progeny) will provide her and her children with support and protection (probably), if her primary husband meets an early demise. And in more primitive times, it was highly probable that any given man would meet an early demise in a battle with another tribe, or while attemting to kill a large animal for food (without, of course, the aid of a rifle). This provided married women with strong motivation to cuckold their husbands (/mates). But I won't belabor this further, since others much more qualified than I have written about it.
Son of John said:
There is just something extra about getting some of another guy's stock of "private" pussy that drives many guys on to look for married women to fuck. Again, they are playing right into our plan.
And the plans of women....
—Custer
* Cherry Lee (Ph.D.), who unfortunately no longer maintains her excellent (former) website "New Directions," pointed out that western women may have something of a "sexuality dent" in their DNA because, during the many centuries of the christian "inquisitions," women who displayed signs of overt sexuality were disproportionately labeled "witches" and "heretics" and burned at the stake — or were otherwise tortured to death in some of the most awful ways imaginable — by church men. "Disproportionately," that is, meaning relative to the numbers of men who were labeled "heretics" and similarly murdered. Dan Brown, author of "The Da Vinci Code" (2003), stated (as I recall) that about 5 million women were murdered by the church during the centuries of the catholic inquisitions.... but he gives no reference, so it isn't possible to know (from his book, which he presented as a work of fiction) how reliable this number might be.