Help keep this site alive with your VIP membership and unlock exciting site features available only to our supporting members!
UPGRADE to get lifetime access to dig420's video section, the Meet Up! forums, AD FREE surfing and much, much more!
On optimal cock size...
- Thread starterCuster Laststand
- Start date
Cock size related to Condom size
An interesting twist from the many un-substanciated surveys:
Quoted from the book: SEX AT DAWN by Christopher Ryan & Cacilda Jetha (which was refered to in these pages, so I purchased it and am fasinated with it's philosophy)
Because ‘fit’ is so important in the effectiveness of Condoms, World Health Organization guidelines specify different sizes for different area’s of the world.
A 49 mm width condom for Asia; A 52 mm width for North America & Europe; and A 53 mm width for Africa. (All condoms are longer than most men ever need). The condoms manufactured in China for their domestic market are 49 mm wide. (Presumably, that is 'flat width')
According to a study conducted by the Indian Council of Medical Research, high levels of ‘slippage and failure are due to a bad fit between many Indian men and the International standards used in condom manufacture.
BBC News online, Dec. 8, 2006
Will this settle any 'Size wars'
Cheers, Harry
An interesting twist from the many un-substanciated surveys:
Quoted from the book: SEX AT DAWN by Christopher Ryan & Cacilda Jetha (which was refered to in these pages, so I purchased it and am fasinated with it's philosophy)
Because ‘fit’ is so important in the effectiveness of Condoms, World Health Organization guidelines specify different sizes for different area’s of the world.
A 49 mm width condom for Asia; A 52 mm width for North America & Europe; and A 53 mm width for Africa. (All condoms are longer than most men ever need). The condoms manufactured in China for their domestic market are 49 mm wide. (Presumably, that is 'flat width')
According to a study conducted by the Indian Council of Medical Research, high levels of ‘slippage and failure are due to a bad fit between many Indian men and the International standards used in condom manufacture.
BBC News online, Dec. 8, 2006
Will this settle any 'Size wars'
Cheers, Harry
Condom Size
"Because ‘fit’ is so important in the effectiveness of Condoms, World Health Organization guidelines specify different sizes for different area’s of the world.
A 49 mm width condom for Asia; A 52 mm width for North America & Europe; and A 53 mm width for Africa. (All condoms are longer than most men ever need). The condoms manufactured in China for their domestic market are 49 mm wide."
"According to a study conducted by the Indian Council of Medical Research, high levels of ‘slippage and failure are due to a bad fit between many Indian men and the International standards used in condom manufacture."
I am Presuming, that this measurement is 'flat width' not 'diameter' since 2" = 52 linear mm on my ruler anyway. Anyone know how to convert that to 'diameter'?
Cheers, Harry
"Because ‘fit’ is so important in the effectiveness of Condoms, World Health Organization guidelines specify different sizes for different area’s of the world.
A 49 mm width condom for Asia; A 52 mm width for North America & Europe; and A 53 mm width for Africa. (All condoms are longer than most men ever need). The condoms manufactured in China for their domestic market are 49 mm wide."
"According to a study conducted by the Indian Council of Medical Research, high levels of ‘slippage and failure are due to a bad fit between many Indian men and the International standards used in condom manufacture."
I am Presuming, that this measurement is 'flat width' not 'diameter' since 2" = 52 linear mm on my ruler anyway. Anyone know how to convert that to 'diameter'?
Cheers, Harry
Harry,
Regarding your question:
For a condom or any flattened cylinder,
"Flat width" = (circumference)/2.
Circumference = (2)(pi)(r), where r = radius and pi = 3.14.
2r = diameter, so circumference = (diameter)(pi)
and "flat width" = (1/2)(diameter)(pi)
or diameter = (2)("flat width") / (pi).
—Custer
Regarding your question:
Harry2614 said:
For a condom or any flattened cylinder,
"Flat width" = (circumference)/2.
Circumference = (2)(pi)(r), where r = radius and pi = 3.14.
2r = diameter, so circumference = (diameter)(pi)
and "flat width" = (1/2)(diameter)(pi)
or diameter = (2)("flat width") / (pi).
—Custer
D
duke9555
Guest
MacNfries said:Ever visit www.sizesurvey.org ? They have every imaginable condom you could think of, and how to size for one. You might want to check it out. Interesting site.
==============
it's dot com not dot org ............carry on
Harry,
Regarding:
1 inch = 2.54 cm = 25.4 mm (you can google it).
Thus, using diameter = (2)("flat width") / (pi)
a condom with a "flat width" of 53 mm would have a diameter of 33.8 mm = 1.33 inch = 1 1/3 inch. That is, if it were "filled" but not stretched.
Whether it could be stretched over an erect cock with a diameter of 2 1/2 inch would have to be determined experimentally, I suppose. That would be stretching the diameter by a factor of 1.9, which would be (I would think) a pretty large stretch.
—Custer
Regarding:
Harry2614 said:
1 inch = 2.54 cm = 25.4 mm (you can google it).
Thus, using diameter = (2)("flat width") / (pi)
a condom with a "flat width" of 53 mm would have a diameter of 33.8 mm = 1.33 inch = 1 1/3 inch. That is, if it were "filled" but not stretched.
Whether it could be stretched over an erect cock with a diameter of 2 1/2 inch would have to be determined experimentally, I suppose. That would be stretching the diameter by a factor of 1.9, which would be (I would think) a pretty large stretch.
—Custer
D
duke9555
Guest
Custer Laststand said:
==========
yeah yeah / check this out
blonde_wife_black_cock - Free Videos Adult Sex Tube - Tube Dong Free Porn Tube Bitches
The truth
Rachel, Clare and Samantha haven't seen each other since High School.
They rediscover each other via a reunion website and arrange to meet for
lunch in a wine bar.
Rachel arrives first, wearing beige Versace. She orders a bottle of
Pinot Grigio. Clare arrives shortly afterward, in gray Chanel. After the
required ritualized kisses she joins Rachel in a glass of wine. Then
Samantha walks in, wearing a faded old tee-shirt, blue jeans and boots.
She too shares the wine.
Rachel explains that after leaving high school and graduating from
Princeton in Classics, she met and married Timothy, with whom she has a
beautiful daughter. Timothy is a partner in one of New York 's leading
law firms. They live in a 4000 sq ft co-op on Fifth Avenue , where
Susanna, the daughter, attends drama school. They have a second home in
Phoenix .
Clare relates that she graduated from Harvard Med School and became a
surgeon. Her husband, Clive, is a leading Wall Street investment banker.
They live in Southampton on Long Island and have a second home in Naples
, Florida .
Samantha explains that she left school at 17 and ran off with her
boyfriend, Ben. They run a tropical bird park in California and grow
their own vegetables. Ben can stand five parrots, side by side, on his
dick.
Halfway down the third bottle of wine and several hours later, Rachel
blurts out that her husband is a cashier at Walmart. They live in a
small apartment in Brooklyn and have a travel trailer parked at a nearby
a storage facility.
Clare, chastened and encouraged by her old friend's honesty, explains
that she and Clive are both nurses' aides in a retirement home. They
live inJersey City and take vacation camping trips to Alabama .
Samantha says that the fifth parrot has to stand on one leg.
Cheers, Harry
Rachel, Clare and Samantha haven't seen each other since High School.
They rediscover each other via a reunion website and arrange to meet for
lunch in a wine bar.
Rachel arrives first, wearing beige Versace. She orders a bottle of
Pinot Grigio. Clare arrives shortly afterward, in gray Chanel. After the
required ritualized kisses she joins Rachel in a glass of wine. Then
Samantha walks in, wearing a faded old tee-shirt, blue jeans and boots.
She too shares the wine.
Rachel explains that after leaving high school and graduating from
Princeton in Classics, she met and married Timothy, with whom she has a
beautiful daughter. Timothy is a partner in one of New York 's leading
law firms. They live in a 4000 sq ft co-op on Fifth Avenue , where
Susanna, the daughter, attends drama school. They have a second home in
Phoenix .
Clare relates that she graduated from Harvard Med School and became a
surgeon. Her husband, Clive, is a leading Wall Street investment banker.
They live in Southampton on Long Island and have a second home in Naples
, Florida .
Samantha explains that she left school at 17 and ran off with her
boyfriend, Ben. They run a tropical bird park in California and grow
their own vegetables. Ben can stand five parrots, side by side, on his
dick.
Halfway down the third bottle of wine and several hours later, Rachel
blurts out that her husband is a cashier at Walmart. They live in a
small apartment in Brooklyn and have a travel trailer parked at a nearby
a storage facility.
Clare, chastened and encouraged by her old friend's honesty, explains
that she and Clive are both nurses' aides in a retirement home. They
live inJersey City and take vacation camping trips to Alabama .
Samantha says that the fifth parrot has to stand on one leg.
Cheers, Harry
Orgasmic capability of women v. men...
Late last night I met with the friend I referred to at the beginning of this thread. During the course of our conversation, I mentioned that in discussing male vs. female orgasmic potential in his book "Insatiable Wives" (2009), David Ley (the author) states that the largest number of orgasms known to have been attained by a man in 24 hours is a number between 20 and 30; something like 25, I vaguely recalled.
My friend's response did not suggest she was impressed.
I continued, and pointed out that Ley goes on to say that comparing the orgasmic capabilities of a woman to the orgasmic capabilities of a man is like comparing the acceleration performance of a Ferrari to the acceleration performance of a beat-up used Ford.
She immediately agreed the comparison was appropriate, and seemed amused. (I was pleased to have amused her.)
I didn't mention this in our conversation, but I'll say here that by way of enlarging on this point Ley quotes some comments by Mark Twain:
"Now here you have an example of man's 'reasoning powers,' as he calls them. He observes certain facts. For instance, that in all his life he never sees the day that he can satisfy one woman; also, that no woman ever sees the day that she can't overwork, and defeat, and put out of commission any ten [men who] can be put to bed [with] her. He puts those strikingly suggestive and luminous facts together, and from them draws this astonishing conclusion: The Creator intended the woman to be restricted to one man."
"So he concretes that singular conclusion into law, for the 'good of all.' And he does it without consulting women, who have a thousand times more at stake than men."
To return to our conversation: I posed a hypothetical question to my friend. Suppose she had available to her, at all times, many physically-attractive young men in good condition who had good-sized cocks. How frequently would she select one and fuck him?
Without hesitating, she replied: "Four times a day."
Late last night I met with the friend I referred to at the beginning of this thread. During the course of our conversation, I mentioned that in discussing male vs. female orgasmic potential in his book "Insatiable Wives" (2009), David Ley (the author) states that the largest number of orgasms known to have been attained by a man in 24 hours is a number between 20 and 30; something like 25, I vaguely recalled.
My friend's response did not suggest she was impressed.
I continued, and pointed out that Ley goes on to say that comparing the orgasmic capabilities of a woman to the orgasmic capabilities of a man is like comparing the acceleration performance of a Ferrari to the acceleration performance of a beat-up used Ford.
She immediately agreed the comparison was appropriate, and seemed amused. (I was pleased to have amused her.)
I didn't mention this in our conversation, but I'll say here that by way of enlarging on this point Ley quotes some comments by Mark Twain:
"Now here you have an example of man's 'reasoning powers,' as he calls them. He observes certain facts. For instance, that in all his life he never sees the day that he can satisfy one woman; also, that no woman ever sees the day that she can't overwork, and defeat, and put out of commission any ten [men who] can be put to bed [with] her. He puts those strikingly suggestive and luminous facts together, and from them draws this astonishing conclusion: The Creator intended the woman to be restricted to one man."
"So he concretes that singular conclusion into law, for the 'good of all.' And he does it without consulting women, who have a thousand times more at stake than men."
To return to our conversation: I posed a hypothetical question to my friend. Suppose she had available to her, at all times, many physically-attractive young men in good condition who had good-sized cocks. How frequently would she select one and fuck him?
Without hesitating, she replied: "Four times a day."
