B
bingo123
Guest
This is an odd question, but yet one that intrigues me a lot,
I was wondering if there were any documented cases on the chances of personally impregnating a woman during group sex. By this I mean say 1 woman has sex with 4 guys in order back to back, assuming she got pregnant from this sex session, is there any statistical data out there that shows either the first, second, third, or last guy is more likely to be the father of the conceived child? or is it all really just a 25% crap shoot at that point?
Its interesting to me, especially since I know the penis has evolved over the years to help remove sperm from the vagina of a previous sexual encounter, so I when I think about it, I know the last guy to have sex would probably have the largest quantity of sperm in the woman, and likewise the first guy to have sex would have the least amount of sperm remaining, but at the same time, his sperm would have been in her the longest, possibly giving it more time to reach its final destination. So I dont know if overall quantity or extra time would give 1 a distinct advantage over another, I'm thinking quantity probably would but I really dont know, especially since the extra time could be having the first guys sperm getting to the egg well before others.
I have done some basic Google searches and cant seem to come up with any real topics on the subject, and if its ever really been looked into, thought about, or researched at all. Maybe someone might have some personal experiences, or some other thoughts on the subject to shed some light on it.
thanks all,
I was wondering if there were any documented cases on the chances of personally impregnating a woman during group sex. By this I mean say 1 woman has sex with 4 guys in order back to back, assuming she got pregnant from this sex session, is there any statistical data out there that shows either the first, second, third, or last guy is more likely to be the father of the conceived child? or is it all really just a 25% crap shoot at that point?
Its interesting to me, especially since I know the penis has evolved over the years to help remove sperm from the vagina of a previous sexual encounter, so I when I think about it, I know the last guy to have sex would probably have the largest quantity of sperm in the woman, and likewise the first guy to have sex would have the least amount of sperm remaining, but at the same time, his sperm would have been in her the longest, possibly giving it more time to reach its final destination. So I dont know if overall quantity or extra time would give 1 a distinct advantage over another, I'm thinking quantity probably would but I really dont know, especially since the extra time could be having the first guys sperm getting to the egg well before others.
I have done some basic Google searches and cant seem to come up with any real topics on the subject, and if its ever really been looked into, thought about, or researched at all. Maybe someone might have some personal experiences, or some other thoughts on the subject to shed some light on it.
thanks all,