Help keep this site alive with your VIP membership and unlock exciting site features available only to our supporting members!
UPGRADE to get lifetime access to dig420's video section, the Meet Up! forums, AD FREE surfing and much, much more!
just married
- Thread startercasie
- Start date
MacNfries said:If true, this ain't for me ... wow! I can accept a woman accidently having another man's baby, but to purposely do it and deny her husband from providing her a child ... Why be married to her?
Because a cuckold wannabe is looking for a fem-dom marriage, so that he can express his masochism ?????????? or submissive, caring side. A cuck can get a lot of attention which he might be craving.
There are many types of cucks
Many cucks place the women in their life on a pedistal, and seek women who dominate them, and treat them like a well loved pet, much like the family Collie dog, and have no desire to bear children of their own. Asking why is like asking why the sun comes up, many answers but beyond our controll. Men marry women with children and raise them with out complaint all of the time. A woman, who is smart enough, most are, to just tell the male what she desires, and is going to do, is much desired and obeyed. The male really has only two choices, take it or leave it, and some do leave because the wife has or will comment infidelity, and if he knows and accepts it he is cuck. It is not cheating if the husband knows his wife has or will take a lover. Many males are bi or gay, or just erotically stimulated by his mates actions. He may want this so much he tries to convience the reluctant female to try this.
I think it is often overlooked we are just one segment of the population, some men will never be cucked and some women are not ever going to be cuckoldress. The dominant cuckoldress, may or may not be especially attractive, but she will believe in herself and demand that things are done in her way. Oh, a woman's wiles, she can simper and use her sultry voice and the promise in her eyes to turn a male into her slave. I sometimes think cucks should be awarded degree belts as the karata students are. Every submisive act, makes the next easier, untill it is not even considered to say no.
MacNfries said:If true, this ain't for me ... wow! I can accept a woman accidently having another man's baby, but to purposely do it and deny her husband from providing her a child ... Why be married to her?
Many cucks place the women in their life on a pedistal, and seek women who dominate them, and treat them like a well loved pet, much like the family Collie dog, and have no desire to bear children of their own. Asking why is like asking why the sun comes up, many answers but beyond our controll. Men marry women with children and raise them with out complaint all of the time. A woman, who is smart enough, most are, to just tell the male what she desires, and is going to do, is much desired and obeyed. The male really has only two choices, take it or leave it, and some do leave because the wife has or will comment infidelity, and if he knows and accepts it he is cuck. It is not cheating if the husband knows his wife has or will take a lover. Many males are bi or gay, or just erotically stimulated by his mates actions. He may want this so much he tries to convience the reluctant female to try this.
I think it is often overlooked we are just one segment of the population, some men will never be cucked and some women are not ever going to be cuckoldress. The dominant cuckoldress, may or may not be especially attractive, but she will believe in herself and demand that things are done in her way. Oh, a woman's wiles, she can simper and use her sultry voice and the promise in her eyes to turn a male into her slave. I sometimes think cucks should be awarded degree belts as the karata students are. Every submisive act, makes the next easier, untill it is not even considered to say no.
Earth rotation and cuckoldresses....
Mimi,
Here:
I would go so far as to suggest there is, in fact, only one answer. It's because the Earth rotates.
Can't argue with this, though.
I suspect there is some truth to this. I would suggest only that perhaps it is dominant cuckoldresses who should be awarded degree belts (like karate students) with colors signifying the stages they have successfully brought their cuckolds to in support of their pursuits of lovers.
—Custer
Mimi,
Here:
mimi27406 said:
I would go so far as to suggest there is, in fact, only one answer. It's because the Earth rotates.
mimi27406 said:
Can't argue with this, though.
mimi27406 said:
I suspect there is some truth to this. I would suggest only that perhaps it is dominant cuckoldresses who should be awarded degree belts (like karate students) with colors signifying the stages they have successfully brought their cuckolds to in support of their pursuits of lovers.
—Custer
Earth rotation and revolution, variations thereof, other events, and 2012
The earth does not reverse its direction of rotation — meaning, at some time in the future the sun will not "rise" in the west instead of in the east. You can take that as a fact. It's required by conservation of angular momentum.
The earth's magnetic field does, however, reverse itself periodically — meaning, the magnetic north pole becomes the magnetic south pole, then later, vice versa. These are called "magnetic reversals." The evidence for it is in the form of magnetized "stripes" in the rocks of the ocean floors, parallel to the mid-ocean ridges. As liquid magma emerges from (say) the mid-Atlantic ridge and cools to form the solid basalt of the ocean floor, thus causing the Atlantic sea floor to spread perpendicular to the ridge, the magnetic minerals in the cooling basalt align themselves parallel to the earth's magnetic field. As you move out from the ridge (in an oceanographic vessel) west or east towing a magnetometer, you discover magnetic "stripes" on the sea floor oriented first north, then south, then north, then south, etc. These magnetic stripes are what resulted in recognition of sea-floor spreading (first published in 1961). The time periods required for reversals of the earth's magnetic field are "long" relative to a human lifetime (but I can't cite a number.... I'd have to look it up).
There are variations in the earth's rotation and in the shape of the earth's orbit caused by the fact that the earth is not subject only to the gravitational field of the sun. Rather, as the earth revolves around the sun it is simultaneously attracted by the gravitational fields of all the other planets, which are all changing position with respect to each other as they too revolve around the sun. This causes:
—precession of the earth's axis, like the "wobble" of a top as it spins. At present the north star is Polaris; in the future it won't be; in the more distant future (more than 10 thousand years from now), Polaris will again be the north star.
—slow periodic change of the angle of tilt of the earth's axis (the angle of tilt is what causes the seasons) by roughly 1 to 2 degrees, over longer time periods of 10's of thousands of years.
—gradual periodic change in the eccentricity of the earth's orbit, which is slightly elliptical (not a perfect circle). That is, the shape of the earth's orbit varies from a "thinner" ellipse to a "slightly fatter" ellipse then back to a "slightly thinner" ellipse, etc., over a time period of about one-hundred thousand (100,000) years.
These slow, steady, periodic changes in the earth's orbit, which combine to form irregular changes (they're rather complicated to compute), act as the pacemaker of the ice ages. These are not changes capable of causing sudden massive extinctions in the biosphere.
There have, however, been catastrophic events in the geologic past that have caused massive extinctions in the biosphere. (The earth, viewed over geologic time, is a rather violent and risky place to live — but fortunately, there are long time periods between the most violent events.) The most catastrophic events appear to be large asteroid impacts, like the one — or several — thought to have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. In doing so, it caused the end of the Cretaceous and beginning of the Tertiary geologic time periods. One huge crater, now buried beneath sediments and covered by jungle, is on the Yukatan(sp?) Peninsula, Mexico. Another huge impact crater, dated to the same time, has been discovered recently in India. Those impacts caused the extinction of (I think) over 90% of the species living on earth at that time.
The second most-catastrophic events that can occur on our planet appear to be volcanic super-eruptions; i.e., those with a volcanic eruptive index of 7 (VEI 7). Yellowstone National Park, in the U.S., has been the scene of several of these in the geologic past.... all those scenic geysers and a huge crater are the smoking guns, one might say. The most recent super-eruption was Toba, in Indonesia — it occurred about 70,000 years ago. At that time, we homo sapiens had been around for quite a while. Prior to Toba, the human population appears to have been roughly similar to the number of people now living in the Detroit area (i.e., on the order of a few million). Toba and the multi-year volcanic winter that followed, which was then followed by an ice-age maximum, reduced the human population to about the number that could fit into a Detroit baseball stadium (on the order of 50,000). For us homo sapiens, it was a *very* close call.... we very nearly did not make it. Throughout the biosphere, many other species were ****** into extinction at that time. (The "History Channel" ran an interesting program on Toba earlier in 2009.)
NASA has a program to track asteroids that may conceivably hit the earth sometime in the future; there are a huge number of them in the asteroid belt but no candidates have been identified for earth impacts anytime soon, it appears. Nothing is on the radar, so to speak, for 2012 or the considerably more distant future. This is good.
Volcano observatories maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with universities and other agencies in the U.S. and other countries, monitor pending eruptions. No super-volcanoes are on the seismometers, so to speak, for 2012 or anytime in the considerably more distant future. This too is good.
MacNfries said:
The earth does not reverse its direction of rotation — meaning, at some time in the future the sun will not "rise" in the west instead of in the east. You can take that as a fact. It's required by conservation of angular momentum.
The earth's magnetic field does, however, reverse itself periodically — meaning, the magnetic north pole becomes the magnetic south pole, then later, vice versa. These are called "magnetic reversals." The evidence for it is in the form of magnetized "stripes" in the rocks of the ocean floors, parallel to the mid-ocean ridges. As liquid magma emerges from (say) the mid-Atlantic ridge and cools to form the solid basalt of the ocean floor, thus causing the Atlantic sea floor to spread perpendicular to the ridge, the magnetic minerals in the cooling basalt align themselves parallel to the earth's magnetic field. As you move out from the ridge (in an oceanographic vessel) west or east towing a magnetometer, you discover magnetic "stripes" on the sea floor oriented first north, then south, then north, then south, etc. These magnetic stripes are what resulted in recognition of sea-floor spreading (first published in 1961). The time periods required for reversals of the earth's magnetic field are "long" relative to a human lifetime (but I can't cite a number.... I'd have to look it up).
There are variations in the earth's rotation and in the shape of the earth's orbit caused by the fact that the earth is not subject only to the gravitational field of the sun. Rather, as the earth revolves around the sun it is simultaneously attracted by the gravitational fields of all the other planets, which are all changing position with respect to each other as they too revolve around the sun. This causes:
—precession of the earth's axis, like the "wobble" of a top as it spins. At present the north star is Polaris; in the future it won't be; in the more distant future (more than 10 thousand years from now), Polaris will again be the north star.
—slow periodic change of the angle of tilt of the earth's axis (the angle of tilt is what causes the seasons) by roughly 1 to 2 degrees, over longer time periods of 10's of thousands of years.
—gradual periodic change in the eccentricity of the earth's orbit, which is slightly elliptical (not a perfect circle). That is, the shape of the earth's orbit varies from a "thinner" ellipse to a "slightly fatter" ellipse then back to a "slightly thinner" ellipse, etc., over a time period of about one-hundred thousand (100,000) years.
These slow, steady, periodic changes in the earth's orbit, which combine to form irregular changes (they're rather complicated to compute), act as the pacemaker of the ice ages. These are not changes capable of causing sudden massive extinctions in the biosphere.
There have, however, been catastrophic events in the geologic past that have caused massive extinctions in the biosphere. (The earth, viewed over geologic time, is a rather violent and risky place to live — but fortunately, there are long time periods between the most violent events.) The most catastrophic events appear to be large asteroid impacts, like the one — or several — thought to have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. In doing so, it caused the end of the Cretaceous and beginning of the Tertiary geologic time periods. One huge crater, now buried beneath sediments and covered by jungle, is on the Yukatan(sp?) Peninsula, Mexico. Another huge impact crater, dated to the same time, has been discovered recently in India. Those impacts caused the extinction of (I think) over 90% of the species living on earth at that time.
The second most-catastrophic events that can occur on our planet appear to be volcanic super-eruptions; i.e., those with a volcanic eruptive index of 7 (VEI 7). Yellowstone National Park, in the U.S., has been the scene of several of these in the geologic past.... all those scenic geysers and a huge crater are the smoking guns, one might say. The most recent super-eruption was Toba, in Indonesia — it occurred about 70,000 years ago. At that time, we homo sapiens had been around for quite a while. Prior to Toba, the human population appears to have been roughly similar to the number of people now living in the Detroit area (i.e., on the order of a few million). Toba and the multi-year volcanic winter that followed, which was then followed by an ice-age maximum, reduced the human population to about the number that could fit into a Detroit baseball stadium (on the order of 50,000). For us homo sapiens, it was a *very* close call.... we very nearly did not make it. Throughout the biosphere, many other species were ****** into extinction at that time. (The "History Channel" ran an interesting program on Toba earlier in 2009.)
NASA has a program to track asteroids that may conceivably hit the earth sometime in the future; there are a huge number of them in the asteroid belt but no candidates have been identified for earth impacts anytime soon, it appears. Nothing is on the radar, so to speak, for 2012 or the considerably more distant future. This is good.
Volcano observatories maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with universities and other agencies in the U.S. and other countries, monitor pending eruptions. No super-volcanoes are on the seismometers, so to speak, for 2012 or anytime in the considerably more distant future. This too is good.
I'm going through this same situation. She started having an affair behind my back with a black dude. She's due to have the baby in July. There a very slim chance that the baby will be mine. She was having sex with him for about two months and I had sex with her a couple of times in between her encounters with him.
I understand people will start gossiping and talking behind your back. But it's your life and YOUR happiness is all that matters.
I'm still working things out with my girl and I'll be updating my situation soon.
The funny thing is... this "affair" has brought us closer.
And listening to her describe her affair in detail has been a very
big turn on.
She has told me the fact that I would accept her infidelity has made
her realize what a good thing she has with me. She doesn't want to
lose me because she knows a guy like me (willing cuck) is hard to find.
It seems we were made for each other.
I understand people will start gossiping and talking behind your back. But it's your life and YOUR happiness is all that matters.
I'm still working things out with my girl and I'll be updating my situation soon.
The funny thing is... this "affair" has brought us closer.
And listening to her describe her affair in detail has been a very
big turn on.
She has told me the fact that I would accept her infidelity has made
her realize what a good thing she has with me. She doesn't want to
lose me because she knows a guy like me (willing cuck) is hard to find.
It seems we were made for each other.
casie said:
