Cock Size and Evolutionary Biology
Josetta said:
There must be a reason why God gave some men "little white pricks". Has anyone worked out what the reason is ?
Ruston says that it can be shown that average cock sizes range by race as follows: Asian-White-Black. More controversially, he finds that average IQ ranks the same way. His main thesis is that more northern races followed the evolutionary path of small nuclear families, monogamy, and rationality because of less favorable environmental conditions, while more tropical peoples were more casual, being more organized as loose networks, since climate allowed for it. The hyperrationality and hypermonogamy of northern peoples was not necessary. But sexual competition on the genetic level meant that things like penis size were generally selected due to more casual rules for mating-- less monogamy.
Most people who know anything about fucking as reality know that giant cocks aren't always the best ride-- my wife says a really large cock can be good because of the expansion, but it has the problem of bottoming out before anything even reaches the clit. Also many women feel pain if the cervix is contacted, unless the preparation is really generous first. A lot of women will tell you that thick is great, but long can be a real problem. Many will say, though, that a really small penis can be a problem too-- so that's not great either.
I think the giant cock thing is like big tits, a fetish for some, not for others-- and not much related to actual sexual pleasure. In the general sense that black people symbolize more relaxed, sensual sexuality-- and sometimes enact it-- that's progressive as far as good fucking is concerned...But it cuts across racial lines. The one black woman I slept with was very cute, but basically a secretary widget, and not very sensual...