How many people in this forum feel as though they are in constant battle against their personal ego?
Is it this constant battle against the EGO, the survival mechanism, built in, which compels us to seek these activities?
We are all spirits, having a physical hallucination, so the ego should have no place in the spirit world, but to preserve our "life". Preserving our lives includes keeping our girlfriends and wives close to us. Correct or no?
So, if we are truly spirits and sharing love and companionship, then there is no absolutes, like monogamous love. Which is certainly an absolute.
I remember once John Lennon saying that suppressing his ego was a full time job or something to that effect. Is it only the ego that prevents us from sharing the ones we love, with others, equally or even more compatible?
Survival means planting our seeds, and keeping our loved ones close and vulnerable to us, and us only. The individual. Many people who work hard to suppress their egos, also feel like sharing what they love most, but it leaves us vulnerable, too. Isn't that vulnerability just the ego screaming out, "please don't leave me alone and vulnerable"?
What if the only thing stopping us from being more open and sharing, caring, and loving, was our egos?
Would that make it more easy for some to come to a peace of mind, with sharing the ones they love the most?
How many out there, in this audience, feel as though we are souls and what we are here for, really, is "experience" and nothing more?
Just wondering. Please share your thoughts.
Is it this constant battle against the EGO, the survival mechanism, built in, which compels us to seek these activities?
We are all spirits, having a physical hallucination, so the ego should have no place in the spirit world, but to preserve our "life". Preserving our lives includes keeping our girlfriends and wives close to us. Correct or no?
So, if we are truly spirits and sharing love and companionship, then there is no absolutes, like monogamous love. Which is certainly an absolute.
I remember once John Lennon saying that suppressing his ego was a full time job or something to that effect. Is it only the ego that prevents us from sharing the ones we love, with others, equally or even more compatible?
Survival means planting our seeds, and keeping our loved ones close and vulnerable to us, and us only. The individual. Many people who work hard to suppress their egos, also feel like sharing what they love most, but it leaves us vulnerable, too. Isn't that vulnerability just the ego screaming out, "please don't leave me alone and vulnerable"?
What if the only thing stopping us from being more open and sharing, caring, and loving, was our egos?
Would that make it more easy for some to come to a peace of mind, with sharing the ones they love the most?
How many out there, in this audience, feel as though we are souls and what we are here for, really, is "experience" and nothing more?
Just wondering. Please share your thoughts.