Hi Custer, very busy with others aspects of my life just now so I'll be very brief.
Firstly, you changed my original comment from one of no major injuries to one of no loss. I never said 'were not hurt physically, financially or in other ways' - my statement was 'In some areas if a crime has been committed against you and you are unhurt, the police's attiude is, you were lucky!'
The two instances I was thinking of when I wrote that were my borther-in-law on his honeymoon who was mugged walking between his hotel and the fastfood restaurant next door. The police's attitude was he was lucky to have a small cut above his eye and wasn't murdered because he was stupid enough to take his wallet out of his pocket in the street. The other was of friends whose house was burgled while they were out. They came back to a ransacked house and desecrated with graffiti. Again the police's comments were that they were forunate to be out of the house at the time.
The answer to your question of 'knew what' was actually contained in the next sentence of my post. My wife knew long before we became engaged or got married that I could never satisfy her sexually. [On a personal level I consider my wife knew [knew what?] and was 'cuckolding' me from before we married. If she knew back then I would never be able to sexually satisfy her, which she later told me, why didn't she declare it then and from the outset be honest and open about it so we BOTH could have made decisions based on the facts.]
Lastly for now, if you apply your own logic to the original context of this post, then you are actually suggesting Malaysia policy of canings and differientiation of females is 'natural'!
Is that your intention??????
Firstly, you changed my original comment from one of no major injuries to one of no loss. I never said 'were not hurt physically, financially or in other ways' - my statement was 'In some areas if a crime has been committed against you and you are unhurt, the police's attiude is, you were lucky!'
The two instances I was thinking of when I wrote that were my borther-in-law on his honeymoon who was mugged walking between his hotel and the fastfood restaurant next door. The police's attitude was he was lucky to have a small cut above his eye and wasn't murdered because he was stupid enough to take his wallet out of his pocket in the street. The other was of friends whose house was burgled while they were out. They came back to a ransacked house and desecrated with graffiti. Again the police's comments were that they were forunate to be out of the house at the time.
The answer to your question of 'knew what' was actually contained in the next sentence of my post. My wife knew long before we became engaged or got married that I could never satisfy her sexually. [On a personal level I consider my wife knew [knew what?] and was 'cuckolding' me from before we married. If she knew back then I would never be able to sexually satisfy her, which she later told me, why didn't she declare it then and from the outset be honest and open about it so we BOTH could have made decisions based on the facts.]
Lastly for now, if you apply your own logic to the original context of this post, then you are actually suggesting Malaysia policy of canings and differientiation of females is 'natural'!
Is that your intention??????