bigpack82 said:I don't know East Africans too well. I've seen many of their females naked (mostly ethiopian), but not the males. Although Horners look quite different to other Sub-saharans, and their morphology is of a different kind. The women still get generous proportions (i.e. booty area) which leads me to believe that despite the differences, there is still something distinctively 'Black' or 'SS-African' going on.
I remember going to Rios (london spa), and seeing a dark-skin black guy (of west indian descent) with one of the tiniest penises ever, and he was naked in the sauna massaging a black woman. Whatever he lacked in dick size, he made up for in charm. So yeah, it does happen...
I tend to believe this to be the case. The more Caucasoid/Europid Indians having the bigger dicks, while the more Indigenous/Proto-Australoid (southies), and the more Mongoloid, the smaller the dick is.
So this could well be where an engrained cultural mentality has emerged whereby Indians 'instinctively' know that a white (or fairer) bull is superior in the sexual endowment department, as the fairer Indians tend to be bigger cocked, and also tend to be better suited for physically intense disciplines.
disclaimer: I always forget to add these disclaimers when talking about racial differences. Before you get on your high horses. This is always a generalisation/tendency, there are going to be tons of exceptions (although the rate of exceptions will also differ ).
@redheads: I'd go out of my way to do her (even though her family would probably strongly disapprove of such a mighty mixed race penis penetrating her lil' brown pussy and enriching her genetic lineage with my afro-european bull juice).
Thats the hottest part
imagine her family being against it, yet she comes to you for a good fuck, that would be really hot
I know some hot indian girls who do this