Susan's Slave said:
I think Rachel Maddow is a very smart, very beautiful woman and a formidable speaker for the far left. I don't agree with her on much but I do enjoy watching/listening to her talk.
A smart and beautiful woman... yes. A formidable speaker... yes. Enjoying watching and listening to her speak... yes. But, I'd say she's a centrist.
fionasissyslut said:
I'm definately not a sinner...
Me neither. Most religions, of course, define sex as "sinful" because everyone does it. I mean, it's necessary for procreation of our species, right...? Since everyone does it, everyone is "sinful." Ergo, everyone needs to believe in their tribal religion, and especially give money to their tribal church hierarchy, in hopes they'll be "absolved" and have their "sins forgiven" (by the unseen voyeur in the sky whom no one can communicate with, but whom they "believe" monitors their every thought and action).
It's a brilliant racket.
fionasissyslut said:
.... You will no doubt be aware that your Christ allegedly preached socialism.
Christ, you say... hm... is there convincing proof he even existed? Not to my knowledge. If he did, is there convincing proof he existed as presented in the New Testament? Not to my knowledge.
But, moving on... socialism, you say... ya' know, here in the U.S. we have Social Security. It's a program that provides modest... actually, quite small... pensions to the elderly, thereby going a long way toward alleviating poverty during old age. Right wingnuts (who benefit from it, along with everyone else) have been trying to get rid of it ever since it was first enacted in 1935.
It's hard to avoid suspecting the most basic problem is the program name, which seems uncomfortably close to "socialism security" which, in turn, brings to mind "socialism," the mere mention of which causes right wingnuts to foam at the mouth.
Thus, the most obvious way to "fix" the supposed long-term financial problems of Social Security (which are mostly fictional, in any case) is for someone to introduce a bill in the Senate to change the program name to Capitalism Security. Who could object? After all, the S.S. checks mailed out to seniors each month are spent on consumer goods, thereby keeping the gears of capitalism whirring. Voila! The strenuous objections of right wingnuts to Social Security would vanish.
But, I digress... what does all this have to do with women cuckolding their husbands? Nothing, I suppose...